Life After Digg: Interview With a Banned Top Digger

Life After Digg: Interview With a Banned Top Digger

With me tonight is Greg Davies, known by most of you as cGt2099, one of the former top Diggers (in fact, Christopher Finke’s top 1000 Digger’s list still shows him at #106), and also runs (more info on his background here).




Top Digger banned from Digg cGt2099

Thanks for spending the time to interview with us.

You’re welcome my pleasure.

1 – We had a chance to catch up with Greg and talk to him about life after Digg. Greg, do you think that you’ve been given a fair shake? Especially considering the content that got you banned was front page on Reddit?

That’s a loaded question. Digg has terms of service, which I, like everyone else agrees to when you sign up. I had been banned a couple of times before, for stupid mistakes, and so the guys behind Digg must have believed, “enough is enough”. It’s their playground, and they set the rules; so I’m fine with that.

On the other hand, there didn’t seem to be any consideration into the fact that I was an extremely active submitter at Digg. I’d posted 1800+ stories since June 2006; and they didn’t seem to consider that I was observing the TOS a majority of the time. Consider also, that some diggers have been banned in the past numerous times also – some of them banned for infractions such as accepting payment for submits/Diggs – the consequences I faced at Digg just didn’t seem to be consistent with the repercussions that had been dealt out in the past.

2 – Digg has really done its fair share of changing the way people look at news. Social media can now deliver the news faster than a lot of traditional media. What did you think of the whole Blu-ray controversy where Digg banned several users and the whole community revolted?

The HD-DVD Riots of May 2007 started out as a valiant effort by some users – but turned into a joke. It caused a huge influx of users to join up just so they could act like Johnny Knoxville and the Jackass crew. So, while I could understand and see the initial point of standing up for yourself and your friends; it turned into something ridiculous. Many regular users were glad once the issue was resolved.

But the key thing about the revolt is that the power of Digg doesn’t truly lie in the hands of Kevin Rose, Jay Adelson et al… the power is in the hands of the users. THEY decide what makes the front page. They’re in control. So while the greatest aspect of Digg becomes raising awareness about certain issues the mainstream media isn’t covering; it’s also it’s greatest dictator: don’t be surprised if another riot happens there one day.

Yes, that’s very true. The power of social media is in the hands of the users. I recall hearing about the Virginia Tech shooting through social media, so it is a very real and powerful force.

3 – You’ve had over 1,800 Diggs submitted and over 30,000 stories Dugg in your Digg career. about how much time would you set aside a day for such activity? Also, how do you view Digg changed over time as it grew in popularity and underwent more social networking changes with the new profile and shout options?

It’s never really been a case where I would “set aside time” to submit stories and Digg stuff. I would just take it all on a “take it as it comes along” basis. So, it would be too hard for me to put a number on it. I would just somewhat integrate Digg into my regular internet surfing and online work. The new profiles at Digg were fabulous, and I really enjoyed the change. It took a little getting used to, but I found it a very valuable tool in being able to connect with others easier. All of a sudden; more diggers were accessible – and with something like Digg, the more networking you have with others, the better.

The shouts, on the other hand, are another story altogether. It seemed that from the get-go, shouts were perceived very differently among different users. Some saw them as great opportunities to share stories; others saw them as just a reprehensible method of spamming others. I honestly did my best to give a chance for the shout feature. If someone shouted me; I’d shout ’em back. But it just became overwhelming and way too time consuming. I ended up having to turn them off on my profile – it was just too much.

4 – What advice do you have for Diggers just starting out? What do you view as compelling content, and where do you think people should go to be on the lookout for good content?

If you’re starting out, don’t dive into the submissions straight away. Seriously. Take the time to just lurk, Digg, read, and even comment. Get a feel for the place first. That’s usually a good method of learning what kind of material has the tendency to become popular. Also, if you only just registered recently; don’t set yourself an unrealistic goal like becoming the number one Digger.

Getting to the top takes time and patience. A LOT of time and patience. When looking for content to post to Digg; I found that the best place is usually with what you are already doing online. In other words, take a look at your regular surfing patterns. Are there any good sites you’re visiting that you don’t often see on Digg? Submit the content from them – others may enjoy it.

One example I can give you is the heavy metal site When I started submitting content to Digg, I NEVER saw that site there. So I started posting content there. I was surprised to find out how many Digg geeks were also metalheads such as myself. Also, get into RSS feeds, and check out what other social news / social bookmarking sites are making popular. There’s a good chance that if it’s popular at Reddit or or StumbleUpon, then there’s a good chance it might become popular at Digg too.

A handy resource for that is Also, don’t just submit any old thing just for the sake of submitting something. Submit something that grabs your attention. If it grabs your attention, then it’s possible it’ll grab the attention of others too.

On a side note, if anyone is just starting out on Digg and is curious as to how to get on Digg’s front page, you might find this article I wrote about it of some help.

5 – I can’t imagine that you would want to be done using social media just because of what happened with Digg. There has been lots of activity on Digg surrounding your ban, and many are wanting you back. What communities do you think you will explore?


I’ve always bounced around different social sites, be it social networking (MySpace/Facebook) or social news/bookmarking (Reddit, etc). At the moment I’ve crashed the party over at It’s similar to Digg, but it’s new, fresh and just starting out. And since starting out over at Mixx, I’ve been posting quite a lot. I’m hoping the community grows over there because it has a lot of potential.

On a related note, I’d like to thank those who’ve been sticking up for me with the whole “permanent ban” issue. Your support is very much appreciated.

6 – Have you closed the book in your mind about Digg? Or would you get right back into it given the opportunity?

If my account is ever reinstated, or if I’m ever allowed to re-register (they permanently banned via IP also, so I haven’t bothered even trying to set up a new account), I would probably submit content to Digg still. But I’m very comfortable with Mixx at the moment, and would love to be more proactive in that community to help it grow.

7 – Any closing comments?

I’d like to say cheers and thanks to all my friends and fans I networked with over at Digg. It was awesome, and the interaction made it all worthwhile. Also, take heed to what you are posting on Digg. Just because it hits the front page on other sites, doesn’t mean that it will fly at Digg – the admins have itchy trigger fingers…. but if you do fall into the ban clan like myself, come on over and help me shake up a little bit.

[Editors Note: If you’re wondering what got Greg banned for the 4th and final time, he speaks about it at length in his personal blog here (h/t: Lyndon)]

Update: looks like support for Greg has really been taking off – check out this parody video of Chris Crocke’s leave Brittney alone:


  1. My site is banned too by Digg, Its All right, My site is still Live, i do not need Digg.


  2. I was banned from digg too. It sucks because not only did they ban me, they also banned my URLs. Life is funny sometimes.

    Jason P’s last blog post..My friend’s blog.

  3. This was a digger that said what he think and that’s what made him very popular. It’s a game, be liked by the community, but without going too far. I think this is a great loss for digg, as he will end up somewhere else, working “against” them.

  4. There is a Firefox extension that allows you to shout only to users who have not DUGG a story. This is a great tool for users of DIGG because, after all, DIGG is a community where you will have a lot of “friends”.

    Using their SHOUT system I will get the same shout from 10 different people. Because we are share the same likes and happen to have common friends. So this is annoying to get 10 emails for the same DIGG.

    Since DIGG is too lazy to add a feature that will not shout to someone who has already DUGG (Honestly how much FUC&ing “SERVER LOAD” can this be?), a clever person created the Firefox extension that does just this.

    I created a post about it and had 200+ diggs before I got banned. Now, almost all the users who Dugg my article have been banned as well.

    I am thinking of starting a F!@# DIGG campaign. I mean, what punks. Ah my email from Digg just came in, if you have read their TOS is is VERY VAGUE (Please explain to me how this hurts your SERVER LOAD!!!)

    “Hi from,

    Your account was reported to us as being in violation of our Terms of Service ( by promoting scripts that are in clear violation of Digg’s Terms Of Service. We must be vigilant in protecting against activities that compromise the Digg community, this decision is final and irreversible.

    Thank you,

    -The Digg Support Team.

    ~ Jim

  5. I heard cGt2099’s story after my account, IP and my site were all banned. I tried to figure out why using Google, since Digg simply told me I violated their terms. Now I’ve fallen in love with Delicious, a better site to manage my internet bookmarks.

  6. It sucks that you spent so much time with Digg, only to get banned by a series of stupid mistakes. Hopefully you will have a much better experience over at Mixx.

  7. Just got banned lol.

  8. @Eric – nice! thx for checking in with us 🙂

  9. I was banned by Digg 2 days ago. They totally suck and at least it is not worth to build some link juice with them because its no-follow. If I were a hacker, I would have crash their entire database and to ruin their life and business because of banning me. But I can’t do that to them, because I admire their hard work of building their website for business.

    Life is life. Time to move on! If someone can dominate Digg’s rank or to create an anti-Digg site, I would be happy for it.

  10. I do think the people working for Digg need to look more closely at the reasons they may want to “Ban” a person than what they are these days…


  1. Greg Davies Interview Life After Digg at memoirs on a rainy day - [...] Greg Davies was permanently banned from Digg. Here is an interview with him. These icons link to…
  2. Add Mixx to the Share This Wordpress Plugin | Search Engine Marketing, Social Media & Web Solutions | Squareoak - New York, NY » Blog Archive - [...] traffic is increasing. Tamar has commented on how early adoption is important and Brian about how banned Digg users…
  3. Going Social for Marketing, Business, and Fun | Social News Watch - [...] in the social media arena are folks that both create and find good User Generated Content (UGC). Interviewing a…
  4. MixxingBowl | » Social Blend - 01 : “You Know….” - [...] Life after Digg: Interview with a banned top Digger [...]
  5. Social Media Marketing, Interview, Social Networking » SEO Chicks - [...] think a better word for “retiring” would be “banning” . Many top Diggers, banned or not, are getting a…
  6. 10 Blog Goals for 2008 - [...] - Not only do more interviews, but be interviewed as well. Appear on podcasts as [...]
  7. 艺术的人生需要人生的艺术 » Blog Archive » Digg Refugees May Be Heading To Mixx - [...] Finally, JD Rucker notes that a lot of top Digg users are at least experimenting with Mixx. And he…
  8. 10 Reasons to Interview on Your Blog - [...] with Chris McGill, founder of Interview with top banned Digger cGt2099 (Greg Davies) Interview with Alexis Ohanian, co-founder…
  9. Catch the brainwaves of Brian Wallace | Broadcasting Brain - [...] both on the giving and receiving end are a lot of fun to do. But you’re right - it isn’t…
  10. SEO 2.0 | What Easter Can Teach Us About Web 2.0, Social Media and Blogging - [...] time. It can be applied on many different levels:a) Social media participationUsers who have been banned on Digg for…
  11. DIGG - THE WORST COMMUNITY DRIVEN SITE | - [...] Life After Digg: Interview With a Banned Top Digger [...]
  12. » Blog Archive » What is cool and what is not (or how to get banned from digg)? - [...] How I got banned from digg How to get banned by digg The hypocrisy of digg and spam Life…
  13. Getting Banned on Digg - [...] out by communicating with the right authorities. There are tons of sites banned by digg, even top users for…
  14. Can the ‘bury’ button save - [...] Digg, during its golden years as the premiere traffic source of “hungry for pageviews” publishers, was known for its…
  15. The Future of Mixx Social Voting: An Interview - [...] s1); })(); Email 4 years ago, we interviewed Greg Davies, a then newly banned Digg power user. Greg helped…

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *