Do Autoburies Exist on Digg.com?
[Today's guest post brought to you by numberneal].
I have seen mainstream sites, such as nytimes.com, aol news, latimes.com, make the front page of digg with 100, 80, 59 diggs. The algo appears to be biased towards mainstream sites. I have made 152 pages popular by mostly submitting mainstream sites – http://digg.com/users/numberneal/history/submissions – without any effort; I barely shout if ever, and I hardly pass links around on im.
I have seen sites with great content and api tools get buried when digg realizes the webmaster is a digg user, even after amassing more diggs than a landscaper – hundreds of diggs, literally. Some sites will not make the front page no matter how many diggs they generate. Even if they reach what would be typically deemed as a front page threshold – e.g. 300, 400, 1000 diggs.
Do you believe that autoburies or administrative buries exist on digg.com? I want to know your opinion. Hit me on Twitter.
Tags: Autoburies, autobury, Digg, numberneal, Twitter
I have to agree with you – I have also seen sites move quickly up the ladder and just disappear…
I hate doing this – but we used to be friends on digg before I got banned – so this might shed a little light on the topic:
http://ya-ttitude.com/blog/2008/10/12/i-walk-through-the-valley-of-the-shadow-of-digg/
Benny
Benny Greenbergs last blog post..1
It exists. Working on proving it.
JD Ruckers last blog post..Does Digg have an Autobury? Show Me the Proof!