<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Social Media Democracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/</link>
	<description>Social Media Marketing Explained</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ZaggedEdge</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/#comment-63493</link>
		<dc:creator>ZaggedEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=320#comment-63493</guid>
		<description>Your brand is who you are, what you represent.  Building this, protecting it and accepting criticism is key.  If your blind to what they say on the net, you lose!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your brand is who you are, what you represent.  Building this, protecting it and accepting criticism is key.  If your blind to what they say on the net, you lose!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 35 Must-Read Articles for Social Media Marketers &#124; Traffikd</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/#comment-62861</link>
		<dc:creator>35 Must-Read Articles for Social Media Marketers &#124; Traffikd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=320#comment-62861</guid>
		<description>[...] The New Social Media Democracy - NowSourcing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New Social Media Democracy - NowSourcing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark&#8217;s Blog &#187; About Time: Finally Made The Digg Front Page</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/#comment-34141</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark&#8217;s Blog &#187; About Time: Finally Made The Digg Front Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 07:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=320#comment-34141</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s not exactly a lifetime achievement, but pretty satisfying after not getting more than 50 Diggs for anything until now.. One more thing to cross off the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s not exactly a lifetime achievement, but pretty satisfying after not getting more than 50 Diggs for anything until now.. One more thing to cross off the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meryn Stol</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/#comment-26001</link>
		<dc:creator>Meryn Stol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=320#comment-26001</guid>
		<description>Mark, you mention "merit" several times. Why do you call it a democracy then? We have another word for such a system: meritocracy.

Democracy comes in to forms: direct democracy (direct referendum) and representative democracy (how most nations are governed). I don't think it's applicable to social media.

The question indeed is how much social media will promote a meritocracy. My personal stance is that it enables it, but does not make it inevitable. Lots depends on the behavior of people. Which people/blogs/voices they pay attention to, especially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, you mention &#8220;merit&#8221; several times. Why do you call it a democracy then? We have another word for such a system: meritocracy.</p>
<p>Democracy comes in to forms: direct democracy (direct referendum) and representative democracy (how most nations are governed). I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s applicable to social media.</p>
<p>The question indeed is how much social media will promote a meritocracy. My personal stance is that it enables it, but does not make it inevitable. Lots depends on the behavior of people. Which people/blogs/voices they pay attention to, especially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark&#8217;s Blog &#187; Posts This Week</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/#comment-25616</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark&#8217;s Blog &#187; Posts This Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=320#comment-25616</guid>
		<description>[...] The New Social Media Democracy - My continued thoughts on the future of blogging. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New Social Media Democracy - My continued thoughts on the future of blogging. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Seall</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/#comment-24985</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Seall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=320#comment-24985</guid>
		<description>Some more direct responses:

@Scott – you are right that rich media will become increasingly important. Probably because it requires less effort to digest, and is therefore more likely to appeal to a wider audience. Getting ranked highly today seems to require a combination of catching attention, and then catching the imagination – and you are right that this will remain difficult. The headline may become king over content..

@Morgan – You hit the nail on the head in terms of the formula that will be required for marketable content in the future. The well thought out pieces will remain niche in terms of coverage – will be interesting to see how they compare in terms of advertising spend.

@Locke – You are right – it will remain a mixture of branding and content. Although we seem to have some more comments now.

@Clif – Very interesting observation! Will definitely dig into that next time around!

@Pedro – It will indeed be interesting to see how the big boys play this one out, and which approach they take. I do see that Yahoo are accepting submissions for other sites (I put my TalkClimateChange blog forward) so perhaps they are going for a spam free, heavily quality controlled version of social media. Interestingly I hear that Yahoo Buzz sends many times the traffic of Digg and the like. Will definitely keep this on the watch list. 

Thanks again for sharing your thoughts!

MarK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some more direct responses:</p>
<p>@Scott – you are right that rich media will become increasingly important. Probably because it requires less effort to digest, and is therefore more likely to appeal to a wider audience. Getting ranked highly today seems to require a combination of catching attention, and then catching the imagination – and you are right that this will remain difficult. The headline may become king over content..</p>
<p>@Morgan – You hit the nail on the head in terms of the formula that will be required for marketable content in the future. The well thought out pieces will remain niche in terms of coverage – will be interesting to see how they compare in terms of advertising spend.</p>
<p>@Locke – You are right – it will remain a mixture of branding and content. Although we seem to have some more comments now.</p>
<p>@Clif – Very interesting observation! Will definitely dig into that next time around!</p>
<p>@Pedro – It will indeed be interesting to see how the big boys play this one out, and which approach they take. I do see that Yahoo are accepting submissions for other sites (I put my TalkClimateChange blog forward) so perhaps they are going for a spam free, heavily quality controlled version of social media. Interestingly I hear that Yahoo Buzz sends many times the traffic of Digg and the like. Will definitely keep this on the watch list. </p>
<p>Thanks again for sharing your thoughts!</p>
<p>MarK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Seall</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/#comment-24736</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Seall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=320#comment-24736</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for your comments everybody, they are much appreciated. I'll be back with further thoughts based on your insights in the near future, and will try to respond to each of your inputs separately - they are all extremely worthy thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for your comments everybody, they are much appreciated. I&#8217;ll be back with further thoughts based on your insights in the near future, and will try to respond to each of your inputs separately - they are all extremely worthy thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/#comment-24709</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=320#comment-24709</guid>
		<description>Social media has definitely changed the landscape of news consumption (in my opinion, for the better). Large media organizations are beginning to set up profiles on sites like Mixx as a way to attract visitors to their sites.

Yahoo and affiliated content producers have taken a different tact, however.  Instead of embracing this democratic approach and trying to be the best at it, they have deemed social media a threat, and have invested a lot of money into countering it.

At first Yahoo Buzz appears to be just like most other social media sites.  A closer look reveals that this could not be further from the truth.  Buzz does not allow its users to submit content, so all of the news appearing on Yahoo Buzz comes from within Yahoo's tight-knit circle of publishers, who (at least on Buzz) do not have to compete with bloggers and smaller content publishers.

I think Yahoo has misjudged the very thing that drives social media, and as a result I expect it will be somewhat of a flop.

&lt;em&gt;Pedro's last blog post..&lt;a href='http://www.healthandwellnessarticles.com/story.php?title=Wellness_lifestyle_can_help_trump_genetics' rel="nofollow"&gt;Wellness lifestyle can help trump genetics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media has definitely changed the landscape of news consumption (in my opinion, for the better). Large media organizations are beginning to set up profiles on sites like Mixx as a way to attract visitors to their sites.</p>
<p>Yahoo and affiliated content producers have taken a different tact, however.  Instead of embracing this democratic approach and trying to be the best at it, they have deemed social media a threat, and have invested a lot of money into countering it.</p>
<p>At first Yahoo Buzz appears to be just like most other social media sites.  A closer look reveals that this could not be further from the truth.  Buzz does not allow its users to submit content, so all of the news appearing on Yahoo Buzz comes from within Yahoo&#8217;s tight-knit circle of publishers, who (at least on Buzz) do not have to compete with bloggers and smaller content publishers.</p>
<p>I think Yahoo has misjudged the very thing that drives social media, and as a result I expect it will be somewhat of a flop.</p>
<p><em>Pedro&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.healthandwellnessarticles.com/story.php?title=Wellness_lifestyle_can_help_trump_genetics'>Wellness lifestyle can help trump genetics</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/#comment-24538</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=320#comment-24538</guid>
		<description>It's funny. I'm seeing more and more direct parallels between what's being discussed in social media and what's happening in the music industry.  We're seeing the major labels jump into bed with music enabled networks like MySpace and Last.fm, leaving true independent artists wondering how this is going to effect them. Meanwhile sites like Pitchfork are getting as much or more respect than Rolling Stone, and a good number of the industry rags are being forced to follow the ad dollars to the web (RIP No Depression). You can pretty much replace the word "content" with "music" (it is content, really) and be having the same conversation that's haunting music industry blogs.

&lt;em&gt;Clif's last blog post..&lt;a href='http://musicin2d.com/?p=10' rel="nofollow"&gt;On Crowdsourcing for Hits&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny. I&#8217;m seeing more and more direct parallels between what&#8217;s being discussed in social media and what&#8217;s happening in the music industry.  We&#8217;re seeing the major labels jump into bed with music enabled networks like MySpace and Last.fm, leaving true independent artists wondering how this is going to effect them. Meanwhile sites like Pitchfork are getting as much or more respect than Rolling Stone, and a good number of the industry rags are being forced to follow the ad dollars to the web (RIP No Depression). You can pretty much replace the word &#8220;content&#8221; with &#8220;music&#8221; (it is content, really) and be having the same conversation that&#8217;s haunting music industry blogs.</p>
<p><em>Clif&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://musicin2d.com/?p=10'>On Crowdsourcing for Hits</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Locke</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/blog/2008/04/14/social-media-democracy/#comment-24459</link>
		<dc:creator>Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=320#comment-24459</guid>
		<description>This is interesting, but the pure lack of comments seems to validate your fear.  Content alone does not make a site or an article.  There still is some branding involved in everything.  It is why because I have no toplevel domain I get maybe 1 comment every 3-4 posts, and why you have only 2 (3 now ) on this post.  It is attached to a known source, but is not one in itself.  There is some work still to do, and I wish I could figure out how to do it, cause my electricity gets shut off tomorrow heh. (literally)

&lt;em&gt;Locke's last blog post..&lt;a href='http://lockenet.blogspot.com/2008/03/enter-your-password-securely.html' rel="nofollow"&gt;Enter your password securely&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting, but the pure lack of comments seems to validate your fear.  Content alone does not make a site or an article.  There still is some branding involved in everything.  It is why because I have no toplevel domain I get maybe 1 comment every 3-4 posts, and why you have only 2 (3 now ) on this post.  It is attached to a known source, but is not one in itself.  There is some work still to do, and I wish I could figure out how to do it, cause my electricity gets shut off tomorrow heh. (literally)</p>
<p><em>Locke&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://lockenet.blogspot.com/2008/03/enter-your-password-securely.html'>Enter your password securely</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
