<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NowSourcing.Com &#187; numberneal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nowsourcing.com/tag/numberneal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nowsourcing.com</link>
	<description>Social Media Marketing Explained</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do Autoburies Exist on Digg.com?</title>
		<link>http://nowsourcing.com/2008/10/17/digg-autobury/</link>
		<comments>http://nowsourcing.com/2008/10/17/digg-autobury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Wallace</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autoburies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autobury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numberneal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowsourcing.com/blog/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Today's guest post brought to you by numberneal]. I have seen mainstream sites, such as nytimes.com, aol news, latimes.com, make the front page of digg with 100, 80, 59 diggs. The algo appears to be biased towards mainstream sites. I have made 152 pages popular by mostly submitting mainstream sites &#8211; http://digg.com/users/numberneal/history/submissions &#8211; without any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Today's guest post brought to you by numberneal].<br />
<a href="http://nowsourcing.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/numberneal.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-431" title="numberneal" src="http://nowsourcing.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/numberneal.jpg" alt="" width="141" height="141" /></a><br />
I have seen mainstream sites, such as nytimes.com, aol news, latimes.com, make the front page of digg with 100, 80, 59 diggs. The algo appears to be biased towards mainstream sites. I have made 152 pages popular by mostly submitting mainstream sites &#8211; http://digg.com/users/numberneal/history/submissions &#8211; without any effort; I barely shout if ever, and I hardly pass links around on im.</p>
<p>I have seen sites with great content and api tools get buried when digg realizes the webmaster is a digg user, even after amassing more diggs than a landscaper &#8211; hundreds of diggs, literally. Some sites will not make the front page no matter how many diggs they generate. Even if they reach what would be typically deemed as a front page threshold &#8211; e.g. 300, 400, 1000 diggs.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HWRi_c0GRgI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HWRi_c0GRgI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Do you believe that autoburies or administrative buries exist on digg.com? I want to know your opinion. Hit me on <a title="notifyneal on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/notifyneal" target="_blank">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nowsourcing.com/2008/10/17/digg-autobury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

