Why Google+ May Not Overtake Facebook

In a press conference this morning Mark Zuckerberg, creator of Facebook, was asked what he thought of the possibly revolutionary launching of Google+. Zuckerberg admitted that he had used it very little but that he believed it was part of the social networking evolution. However, Google+ is also his competition, it is offering Circles, which basically allows you to label your friends and groups and choose who sees what and which group you publish content to. It also offers Hangouts, which is the video group chat, Sparks, a feed that revolves around you and only videos, articles, and offers you would be interested in, and Huddle which allows you to text as a group. Since the two networks are so similar, but one comes with more features (so far), people will eventually make a choice. There will be resistance at first just as there was when Facebook blew Myspace out of the water, but as of right now, Google+ sounds like the next step and Facebook may not have the technology to catch up.


Google+ began a beta release for the network last month, giving only a select few people access – this gave off the impression that the network was elite, leaving those who weren’t allowed dying to see what all the fuss was about. Another blow to Facebook’s ego was the group chat offered on Google+ that clearly overshadowed Facebook’s partnership with Skype, who was recently bought by Microsoft for $8.5 billion before they were aware of Google’s innovative software.


The reason Google+ may not take over Facebook is because despite Google’s Vice President, Vic Gundotra’s belief that they are meeting the needs of the people and their desire to connect, they are really adding a bunch of bells and whistles to a system that was already meeting this need. Also many users may not be ready for the commitment that goes along with another social network.

If Zuckerberg does come out with something innovative or finds a way to at least make group chat available before Google+ is fully launched he may have a shot. However, Zuckerberg recently said they are not focusing on the number of users so much anymore but the features, this was a little unsettling. The fact that Facebook lost around 6 million users in May, may have provoked this comment, and since Google+ is ahead in the feature department it will make a come back even more difficult. The worst thing he could do is reformat the entire network like Myspace did when they saw that Facebook was taking them over – they ended up going beyond their site’s capacity and that helped in everyone’s decision to go full Facebook. Whether or not Facebook survives the war or falls as the social media empire, social networking is evolving right before our eyes and it should be a very interesting change.


  1. John

    Facebook’s reign will end at some point–this much we know. As much as I love Google, I’m not so sure they will be the ones to capitalize on a potentially mutinous community. The appeal of G+, from my experience, is easy interaction and sharing with not only people you know, but complete strangers. In the week or so I’ve been a member, I’ve had plenty of conversations with people nearby and across the world; this was all done without the need to add someone as a “friend” and await their confirmation as said “friend.” I’m perfectly happy with the Farmville Mom’s and people who don’t understand the internet to stay on Facebook and not pollute my news feeds with app requests and all of that noise; pretty much everyone in my G+ circles is very tech savvy like myself or, at least, isn’t as dumb as a rock when it comes to technology and social media. I suppose I’d even argue that G+ is even aimed at us more technical people because of our love and understanding of Google’s business models and services, but I do not believe a savvy-oriented social network will succeed, regardless of who is pushing behind it. Leaked web code has already shown that Games and some sort of Apps model is coming to Google+ because, lets face it, games are so integrated with Facebook that a great deal of people are going to want that functionality elsewhere should they even decide to pack up and move. All in all, I’ve found G+ to be like Twitter but with threaded conversations to follow between multiple sources–this is an idea I love and hope others can love. Teenagers whining about their unfair parents can stay elsewhere, but I welcome a mature community rising up and slaying the Dragon.

  2. Pamela Egan

    ” … they are really adding a bunch of bells and whistles to a system that was already meeting this need.”

    With the above statement, the author hit the nail on the head. This is exactly why I do not foresee myself ever making +1 a regular part of my social media regimen. I am already committed to using too many different services to keep up with friends and business contacts, and I don’t have time for another service that really doesn’t offer me anything new, novel or unique.

    Great article BTW. I couldn’t have articulated it any better myself.